Submissions by topics "I disagree with the proposed amendment"
|
Thank you for allowing me to voice my opinion on this very important topic. My dog is 8 years old and has been walking in Santry Woods off-leash since he was 8 weeks old. To not allow our dogs to...
|
In all the years I have been walking dogs off the lead in open fields in large parks etc I have never witnessed any other dog off lead not under control ofits owner. In fact dogs need to socialise...
|
|
I totally disagree with the change to Section Three - Bye Law 4.7 being amended. The leashing of dogs in park is, in my opinion, counter intuitive. Dogs need to be exercised in order to have a...
|
*/
Put your energy in addressing what issues there may be not in blanket bans that discriminate.
Responsible dog owners require support not penalisation.
I am a responsible dog owner. I have a...
|
|
The law at the moment states: dog under control or on a lead. The incidences in the park referred to dogs not under control. There should always be differences between a dangerous or restricted breed...
|
There are very few occasions where I can let my dog off lead to have a good run around; certainly our town parks and estates are not suitable for this. Ardgillan is one of the few places where dog...
|
|
Do not make it so all dogs have to be on a leash.
|
Bad legislation full stop
Dogs need exercise, our tax payers cash is better spent dealing with puppy farning and other animal abuse issues. Dogs being off leash if under control is not generally an...
|
|
As as dog owner I do not agree that we should be forced to keep our animals on a leash at all times. This is completely unfair and cruel to the animals. Dogs have a right to exercise and freedom to...
|
The current bye-laws state that dogs must be under adequate control at all times. Where dogs are under control it is unfair to keep them on lead at all times and deny them the opportunity to run and...
|