Submissions by topics "I disagree with the proposed amendment"
|
When Malahide Castle park first opened to the public in the 1970's cycling was not allowed. Then, sometime in the 1990's I believe, it was decided, for safety reasons, to allow schoolchildren to...
|
This Bye Law all ready covers every area necessary as it stands, I do not see why Fingal Council would want to grant permission to a third party to remove trees, flowers etc.
|
|
I read the proposed amendment to the parks and open spaces bye laws. I wonder why the original bye law is on longer suitable i.e on a lead or under adequate supervision? I walk my dog daily in...
|
I object to any speed increase in speed limits within public parks.
Section Two (I) I object to this proposal regarding parking, any member of the public should be allowed to use parking facilities...
|
|
I am against this proposal to change in relation to Malahide Castle which is my local parkland. The public pathways within the castle have already been used for commericial use by bicycles and...
|
As the current speed limit of 15 kph is not adhered to by most drivers, I believe it would be foolhardy to increase it as drivers would be inclined to go even faster than the proposed 20 kph. Over...
|
|
Sharing the pathways in Malahide castle with motorised vehicles (especially the vans&trucks delivering to Avoca) is especially dangerous for young children as it is. Dedicated pathways should be...
|
I strongly disagree with the proposed wording changes. I believe dogs that are not under their owners control or are a restricted breed should be placed back on a leash but dogs that are with...
|
|
There is no dog park in Malahide Castle, which means my dog would have to be on the lead for the whole walk. This is very unfair to the dog and also to responsible dog owners.
|
No reason has been given as to why the vehicular speed limit should be raised in parks which are in their essence recreation areas. It seems likely to increase the risk of accidents causing serious...
|